Turn a 2,000-page RFP into trade scope packages in hours, not weeks.
TeraContext.AI reads the specs, drawings and addenda, classifies every section to your WBS, and builds the scope packages, sub bid analysis and GC proposal. Your estimators approve every classification.
- Estimators approve every classification
- Answers cited to section, sheet and page
- Can run in your environment
Review & Classify, on a public municipal library bid set
From the RFP landing to the proposal shipping, in six steps
Upload the whole bid set
Drop in spec volumes, drawing sets, addenda, contracts and geotech reports. Processing starts on its own.
- You give it
- PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, images
- You get
- Every spec section split out and browsable by code
- Time
- 10–20 minutes for a 1,000+ page spec book

Every section classified to your WBS
A 7-phase pipeline built for construction documents maps each spec section and drawing note to a WBS code and scores its own confidence.
- Formats
- 11 industry-standard WBS formats, or your own
- You get
- A code, a source and a confidence score on every line
- Drawings
- A vision model reads every sheet

Your estimators make the call
Confirm the high-confidence classifications in bulk, typically 70–80% of sections, and spend your time on the edge cases. Nothing is packaged until your team approves the WBS.
- Bulk
- Confirm everything above 90% in one click
- Edge cases
- Correct, flag or reclassify line by line
- Control
- WBS approval gates scope packages

Scope packages and SOWs by trade
Approved sections roll up into trade packages. Rename, split and merge until the breakdown matches how you bid, then generate a statement of work per trade in your own template.
- Packages
- Export as CSV, PDF, Word or Markdown
- SOWs
- Scope items, alternates and exclusions per trade, as .xlsx
- No overlap
- Each task item belongs to exactly one trade

Sub bids, checked against the scope
Invite subs from your directory to bid on specific packages. Upload each response and the AI reads it against the package it was meant to cover.
- Directory
- 29 standard construction trades
- Compare
- Bids side by side, per package
- Scope coverageWhat the sub actually priced
- ExclusionsIncluding the ones buried in the fine print
- AlternatesOffered substitutions and options
- QualificationsConditions attached to the number
- Risk flagsItems your team should look at first
The GC proposal, assembled
Accepted sub bids come together into your proposal response, checked against the original RFP before it goes out.
- Check
- Compliance check against the RFP
- Export
- PDF or Word, for final editing
- Coverage matrixWhich bid covers which scope
- Gap analysisScope nobody has priced yet
- Per-trade narrativesWritten from the accepted bids
- Executive summaryThe response at a glance
Weeks of reading become hours of review
Missed sections become change orders. The point of the pipeline is that every section is accounted for before the packages go out.
A public municipal library and parking garage, decomposed
Not a mock-up. These are screens and counts from the platform after processing one public bid set.




Built so you can check the work
Your team has the final say
Every classification carries a confidence score and waits for an estimator. Scope packages are built only from an approved WBS.
Every answer shows its source
Query answers cite spec section codes, drawing numbers and page ranges, so checking one takes seconds.
Specialized, not a generic chatbot
Seven phases purpose-built for construction documents, with RAG, GraphRAG and a vision model for drawings.
Your documents stay yours
Encrypted in transit and at rest, role-based access, audit trails, and never used to train AI models. It can also run in your environment.
- PDF extraction
- Table extraction
- Section splitting
- Embedding
- WBS classification
- Graph building
- Cross-ref validation
Jim Smith, Ph.D., P.E. is a registered professional engineer whose training spans electrical and structural work. He builds TeraContext.AI in McLean, VA as part of Joshua8.AI. Design partners work with him directly.
About the founder and the company →11 industry-standard WBS formats, or your own
WBS formats, including
- Commercial spec divisions
- UFGS
- PennDOT-408
- FERC Generation
- EPRI GN-COA
- DOE Nuclear
- DOE Buildings
- NAHB Residential
- + Custom taxonomies
Clone any standard format and add, rename or reorganize codes to match your firm's own system.
Project types
- Multi-Family
- Office
- Municipal
- Parking
- Retail
- Hotel
- Strip Mall
- Mixed Use
Also in the platform: automated document review for spec and drawing conflicts, and six documented workflows.
Bring a current RFP. See it decomposed on your documents.
TeraContext.AI is in Early Access. We work with a small group of general contractors, on their own bid sets, and they shape what gets built next.
- Intro call. We learn how your team bids today.
- Pick a project. A current or recent RFP you know well, so you can judge the output.
- Run it together. Your estimators check the classifications and packages against what they would have produced by hand.
A personal reply within one business day.
A good fit if
- Your spec books run 500+ pages
- Decomposition and scope packaging take days or weeks
- You bid to subs across many trades
- Missed scope has cost you in change orders
- You carry several RFPs at once
Probably not a fit if
- You build small residential work without complex spec books
- Your projects have no multi-trade sub bidding
- Specs run under 100 pages per project
One set of documents, every seat at the table
Watch all the role videos, plus the affordable housing view →
Latest on AI and construction documents
-
AI for Documents
A Bridge's Day: Sun, Shadows, Trucks and Code Checks, Driven by Claude Code and Elmer FEM
Claude Code drove the open-source Elmer FEM solver through a hot July day, truck loads and AASHTO checks on Bridge B-676, and independent checks caught eleven plausible-looking errors.
Read the post
-
AI for Documents
Steam Shovels for Design Engineers: Driving Civil 3D, Revit, and Navisworks with Claude Code
In about 32 prompts, Claude Code drove Civil 3D, Revit, and Navisworks through a full road-and-bridge BIM project: ~$942 versus ~$32,000 of drafting.
Read the post
-
AI for Documents
The Steam Shovel Moment for Civil Engineering Drafting
Three AI agents got the same week-long Civil 3D homework: Claude Opus finished in 65 minutes, unattended; two local Qwen runs stalled.
Read the post





